Friday, October 2, 2026

The Fourth Ecumenical Council – The Council of Chalcedon by Father Glenn Baaten

Dear friends in Christ,

We are now halfway through our consideration of the great Councils of the undivided Church during the first millennium. In our very first article, we were introduced to what are commonly referred to as the Seven Ecumenical Councils, and in subsequent articles, we reflected upon the Councils of Nicaea, Constantinople, and Ephesus. In this article, we will delve into the fourth of these gatherings: the Council of Chalcedon (pronounced kal-SEE-don). The Council was held in 451 AD, which today is located in the district of Kaldikoy, in Istanbul, Turkey.

As with the preceding Councils, the principal theological consideration at Chalcedon was Christological—concerning the Person of Jesus Christ, who is fully God and fully man. (You may recall that in our consideration of the Council of Constantinople, the full divinity of the Holy Spirit was also affirmed.) The Council of Chalcedon sought to further clarify how Christ's divinity and humanity are united in His one Person.

At the heart of the controversy addressed by Chalcedon was the relationship between Christ's divine and human natures. How can Jesus Christ be truly God and truly man without His divinity and humanity being either confused or separated?

The Council responded by affirming several essential truths:

·     Christ is one Person. Against any teaching that divided Christ into separate subjects, the Council affirmed the complete unity of the Person of Jesus Christ. His divine and human natures do not make Him two separate individuals.

·     Christ possesses two distinct natures. His divinity and humanity are neither confused nor changed into something else; Christ remains fully God and fully man.

·     Christ's two natures are united in one Person and one hypostasis. The divine and human natures are united without being mixed, changed, divided, or separated. This is commonly referred to as the hypostatic union.

 The Council produced and promulgated what is known as the Chalcedonian Definition. In describing the mystery of the Incarnation, the Definition teaches that Christ is to be acknowledged “in two natures,” united in one Person and one hypostasis. In this way, the Council sought to safeguard both the full divinity and the full humanity of Christ, preserving the mystery of the Incarnation.

Getting Theological: The Hypostatic Union

To get a bit more technical, the term hypostatic union (the unified subsistence of divine and human attributes) was articulated by the Council to explain the doctrine that Jesus Christ is simultaneously fully God and fully man. He unites two complete and distinct natures—one divine and one human—in a single person.

In short: One Person, Two Natures. Jesus is not two separate individuals, nor is He a hybrid third nature. He is one unified identity who possesses all the attributes of true deity and true humanity completely and simultaneously.

The Impact and Reception of Chalcedon

While the Seven Ecumenical Councils are traditionally understood as expressions of the faith of the undivided Church of the first millennium, the reception of Chalcedon was not universal. A number of ancient Christian communities did not accept the Council's Definition and came to be known as non-Chalcedonian—or, more commonly today, the Oriental Orthodox Churches.

Among these are the Coptic Orthodox Church of Egypt, the Armenian Apostolic Church, and the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church in India, along with other Oriental Orthodox communities. These Churches rejected the Chalcedonian Definition because they understood its terminology differently from the Byzantine and Western Churches, preferring formulations that emphasized the absolute unity of Christ's nature after the Incarnation. They historically emphasized the formula of “one incarnate nature of God the Word made flesh.”

Modern theological dialogues have shown that these historical differences are far more nuanced than terminology alone suggests. Recent discussions between ancient traditions have found substantial agreement in their shared confession of Jesus Christ as fully God and fully man, even while differences remain concerning terminology and historical interpretation. And, thanks be to God, the Diocese of Orange is actively engaged in ecumenical dialogue not only with our Eastern Orthodox neighbors (who affirm Chalcedon), but also with our Oriental Orthodox brethren who remain non-Chalcedonian. Along with Fr. Al Baca, I am blessed to be part of that ongoing discussion.

The Council of Chalcedon stands as a pivotal milestone in the Church's ongoing effort to faithfully proclaim the mystery of Jesus Christ: one Person, truly God and truly man.


No comments:

Post a Comment